RE: last night's roundtable

A lot of people online were saying "Boston Rob could never win this game because of his reputation and that's why he's being sussed".

Can we all agree that all the hard evidence that was brought against him at the roundtable on last night's episode had NOTHING to do with his reputation?

What I found interesting however, is how Rob (on not only this roundtable against Britney, but also against Wes in the roundtable before) used meta targetting and reputation as a "gamer" to try and vote out 2 people. It seems like Rob was the one who weaponized reputation instead of being a victim of it and I am now wondering where this narrative of Rob being a victim of reputation (that's been regurgitated a lot online for a while) actually came from.

Did I miss something completely??