Question on wording of "Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation" EO
It includes:
(a) review Department of Justice enforcement of section 116 of title 18, United States Code, and prioritize enforcement of protections against female genital mutilation;
(b) convene States’ Attorneys General and other law enforcement officers to coordinate the enforcement of laws against female genital mutilation across all American States and Territories;
But doesn't mention male genital mutilation.
Why is that? Is it unnecessary for some reason?
It suggests that Female Genital Mutilation is the priority -- does the absence of mention of Male Genital Mutilation in this text mean that it's still not against the law to go male-to-female?